• crawlspace@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Glad to know I’m in the clear with my little 40%. Or is my mental so disordered that its come full circle back to an actual keyboard?

  • Soapbox1858@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 days ago

    I have a full-sized and a 96%. I don’t know how people live without a numpad. Even my laptop has a numpad. I don’t do excel shit. But at work I have to enter alot of phone and CC numbers. At home I use the numpad for rating photos when sorting and importing them.

    • FozzyOsbourne@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t know how people live without a numpad

      Simple, they don’t need to do all those specific things you use yours for!

    • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I use the number pad for various keybinds in games where there are too many things to control with the keys I regularly use.

      • damdy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Are you Grubby? No actual human uses number pad for keybinds in games, only game Gods who learned before there were real alternatives.

        • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          The numpad is still a popular option in roguelikes. It’s also worth noting that sometimes the ortholinear layout of numpad keys is more appropriate than the staggered layout of letter keys.

        • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I use it for keybinds that I don’t use very often, but still need on occasion. Frees up the other keys for more important stuff. Very useful for weapon hotkeys in games like Fallout when I have a ton of guns.

    • CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah 96% is great for me. I work in commercial credit analysis and I’m constantly typing numbers (account numbers/financial information/etc) so not having a number pad would suck. I work from home like 75% of the time and my work space is shared with my personal computing space. I have 1 keyboard that’s Bluetooth so I can swap between my personal desktop, personal laptop, and my work laptop. Same with my mouse. Sometimes I do think about getting a smaller keyboard and adding a separate numpad that can tuck out of the way when I’m not working as I don’t use it much for personal computing.

  • MoreFPSmorebetter@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    I literally will not ever daily use a keyboard if it doesn’t have a number pad.

    Any time I’m forced to temporarily use anything without a num pad I feel like I’m driving a car that’s missing half it’s steering wheel or something. It just feels wrong.

  • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ve been moving toward preferring full keyboards, but I wish it were more normalized for them to put the numpad on the left side.

  • rowdyrockets@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m gonna catch some heat…. But I gotta speak my truth - this is all I need. I game, I program, I have 2 function keys that change the layout and provide access to any keys not physically present.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    sorry but I agree. numpad masterrace. say no to degenerate keyboards.

  • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    4 days ago

    While I love my full-sized keyboard, respectfully - who cares. The whole idea of a PC is the freedom to use whatever you want.

    Keyboards, controllers, speech to text, a wii-mote, literal bananas/bread, eye/blink trackers, whatever suits you best. Insisting there’s a best device for everyone doesn’t change people’s minds and just leads to hostility when we should be glad more people are using the device that makes them happy. One day you might be one of them when your circumstances or preferences change.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      4 days ago

      Full-size is objectively superior, everything else is a mitigation for sub-optimal circumstances.

      If you have reduced desk space and need to conserve your keyboard size to allow more room for a mouse then absolutely, pick as small a keyboard as you’re comfortable with to get sufficient mousing space.

      Anything beyond that is subjective personal preference, which again I have no qualms with, but calling it better without further qualification is going to invite incredulity.

      • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        If a full-sized keyboard provides all the keys you reasonably need to do your tasks efficiently, then yes a full-sized keyboard is superior. But that is just not the use case for everyone, hence why it can’t be objectively so. Unless you want to imply that more keys even if you don’t need them is better anyways.

        If so, you could argue this monstrosity of a keyboard (or something even bigger) is what everyone should be using if they have the space, since it has way more buttons than a full-sized keyboard, making it even more objectively superior. In reality you would not use more than 30% of the buttons on that keyboard, so the rest might as well not exist. But if you are, I don’t know, some macro-wizard playing 4 instances of WoW at the same time, maybe it is objectively superior for your needs, but for me a normal sized keyboard would do.

        But to try and sense where you’re coming from, it should also be said that someone telling you their choice is better and disregarding that your criteria aren’t the same as theirs is being silly as well. And sometimes they can be stubborn and agitated about that as well - exactly the kind of hostility I meant in my initial comment. But someone’s got to step up and swallow their pride and accept it really is just all subjective at the end of the day.

        • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          the main advantage of full sized keebs iirc is that some programs have key combos involving F keys or home/end and don’t support changing the mapping (Minecraft shakes fist at sky F3+g)

          • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            That’s true, and if that’s the case then that definitely changes the choice. Although, afaik these smaller keyboards often come with software to remap keys or add macro’s at the driver level. (And for this choice specifically, 75% keyboard and higher do seem to mostly have both F keys and home/end). But yeah, some people’s use consist of just writing emails and streaming video, in which case they won’t care about any of that.

        • vithigar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          My biggest problem with that “monstrosity” is that it’s ortholinear.

          You imply that such a thing being “optimal” is absurd, but if you had infinite usable desk space then what, exactly, would be the argument against it? If space is not a consideration then what does it matter if you don’t use every key?

          Lots of people like smaller keyboards, and that’s perfectly fine. I get it as an aesthetic choice, and for many people it may not impact their daily use at all. But you will not convince me that removing the option of having additional keys for binding is a non-zero cost, even if they’re not currently being used.

          For what it’s worth, I never used anything like that monstrosity, but I was quite happy with my G15 for the time that I had it which had 18 additional keys, plus media control, over a typical full size.

          • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            but if you had infinite usable desk space then what, exactly, would be the argument against it?

            So I guess we agree then. Circumstances make something more or less optimal, meaning they are not objectively more optimal in every situation. That was my entire point, nothing more.

      • _stranger_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        No one has discussed split keyboards, which offer all the benefits of a full size and addresses ergonomic concerns across the board. Need only half your keyboard today? Done and done.

        Need ALL the keyboard, we gotchu.

        • monarch@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I have the IRIS CE and its kinda like that bought the stands for it and it has noticably reduced the strain on my wrists when I play games.