• PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 days ago

    Explanation: The US Civil War was kicked off in 1861 after the election of the antislavery candidate Abraham Lincoln in late 1860. The radical antislavery position Lincoln held?

    … that slavery shouldn’t be allowed to expand outside of the South.

    Not “Slavery must be immediately destroyed by the Federal government”. Not even “Slavery in the South must be reduced by the Federal government.” Just “No expansion.”

    Obviously, to the slaver cunts, this was unacceptable oppression, and they then attempted to secede after losing said democratic election.

    • Mesophar@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      I may be incorrect, but wasn’t Lincoln’s position even less direct and was “new states should decide for themselves”, but the south wanted “new states have an automatic yes”?

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        Lincoln was opposed to the expansion of slavery into the territories, and believed that the Federal government did not have the power to remove or prevent slavery from expanding into states, but could do so to territories.

        One of his Democratic opponents in the election, Douglas, took the ‘moderate’ position of letting territories decide for themselves, while the majority South opinion championed by his other Democratic opponent, Breckenridge, was that slavery could not be forbidden from the territories.

  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Literally anyone with privilege, when they lose even a sliver of that privilege: “I am being oppressed”

  • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    The government is trying to limit what i can do with my rightful property. Why shouldn’t I be able to take my property with me wherever I move?

  • Kaboom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    Democrats during the civil war: who will work the fields except for this easily exploitable labor force?

    Democrats during Jim crow: who will work the fields except for this easily exploitable labor force?

    Democrats now: who will work the fields except for this easily exploitable labor force?

      • Kaboom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s not the running theme there. Rural white landowners are against immigrants now. The thing connecting them is the Democratic party.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          That’s not the running theme there. Rural white landowners are against immigrants now.

          Oh no, they’re for immigrants. They just don’t want immigrants to have any rights. If they’re constantly in fear of being deported, they can be exploited in all sorts of fun ways.

          • Kaboom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            4 days ago

            How on Earth do you get “we want them here” from “deport them”???

            • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              4 days ago

              From the massive numbers of undocumented immigrants rural white landowners employ despite US employment standards making it nearly impossible for any serious business to accidentally and unknowingly hire undocumented immigrants over-the-table.

              • Kaboom@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                4 days ago

                Do you honestly think that most rural landowners are corporate farms or some shit? Because they aren’t. The vast majority own 100 acres or less, and don’t really have much need for extra hands. Hell, Id wager that most of them don’t even farm or ranch or whatever. Hell, my brother in law’s father is a Sheriff and owns forty acres of woods. One of my buddies has 30 some acres and does jack shit with it aside from store rusty cars. And his buddy has over a hundred acres of deer lease. None of them have employees, legal or other wise. I myself have nine acres, most of which is flood plain.

          • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            i wish recognizing the shitty situation we are in doubled as coping, cause i need a whole bunch of it.