• skoberlink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gitea is FOSS under the MIT license. Is the title just phrased oddly? They do offer hosting for profit but I thought the software met the definition of FOSS.

    • NeshuraA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Gitea is under the MIT license, so FOSS, but the For-Profit managing it could at any point switch the license going forward. For example to lock Features for Self-Hosters behind a Paywall like Gitlab does

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Depends, if they take outside contributions and do not insist on a CLA then copyleft projects can’t be easily relicensed.

        • wiki_me@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Theoretically yes, in practice a project gains reputation and it’s managers gain skills and experience, so i fork isn’t always migrated to easily and it might be harder to keep it going, look at reddit , having the source code didn’t really help and despite lemmy being in development for years the reddit ecosystem (RES in particular) still has advantages that are important at least to me.

    • kill_dash_nine@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use Gitea myself and when the big dust up about the backing company came up, I didn’t feel like there was a big enough reason to migrate away from Gitea. Just because they could do something wasn’t enough of a reason for me. Sure it’s great that they are running a fork that I could switch to but I currently don’t see a reason to switch as of today.