• conciselyverbose@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    If they’re going to lie to pretend they can’t include it because it’s unsafe when every single person on the planet knows with 100% certainty that it’s because they want their own cash/data hungry alternative instead, then putting said “unsafe” thing in their vehicles should absolutely expose them to liability.

    There absolutely is not a theoretical possibility that “safety” was a genuine consideration in any way in this decision.