Complaint claims organization’s “Great 78 Project,” which includes music from Frank Sinatra, Ella Fitzgerald, and more serves as an “illegal record store”

  • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The internet archive has been an invaluable resource to my academic work, preserving sources that otherwise would have been lost to time.

    Shame to see it under attack as of late.

  • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know you’ve sold your soul when your career choices require you to compose this line, and to do so pejoratively.

    “Internet Archive unabashedly seeks to provide free and unlimited access to music for everyone”

  • MagicShel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    “In reality, Defendants are nothing more than mass infringers.”

    Nothing more? Really? I mean it sounds like they are on shaky ground with this project, but that statement seems awfully reductive. It’s okay; they are allowed to be important and good and also be wrong (if they are, I’m not a lawyer).

    • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Given the age of the music they cite this whole thing reminds me how ridiculously long copyright terms are.

      • NeshuraA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Imo modern copyright and trademarks will be our downfall. Can’t get shit done because big companies can just lock shit behind a closet for almost over a lifetime.

  • Jaded@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s kind of crazy to see it all on there for individual download. It should only be available in bulk imo, to act more as an archive and not a pirate site.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would one not be able to get individual items from an archive? It’s there for people to access the stuff, not just for people setting up other archives.

      • Jaded@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        To avoid being sued? The internet archive shouldn’t be acting like a new age limewire. I hate record companies as much as the next guy but I use torrents and youtube-dl. No need for the internet archive to be offering the service at such risk.

        They hold a lot of important stuff, I just don’t want open season to be declared on suing them. Pick your battles kind of moment.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          They shouldn’t have to do that. Owners of IP they don’t publish it should lose their IP within a year.