• Annies_Boobs@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    What the actual heck is happening to the internet. It feels like it is being destroyed at a breakneck pace.

  • Mika@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    if youtube could win against adblockers, they wouldn’t need to get manifest v3 to destroy their functions. firefox users stay winning

  • NataliePortland@thegarden.land
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Totally. YouTube is barely scraping by these days. Them and all of Google. They’re riding the bus to work. They had to stop eating out. Poor almost richest company in the world. They NEED us to turn off as lockers or else they’ll have to shut the whole thing down

    • Buttons@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If this is true, it seems like a condolence of what YouTube is doing here. If hosting all those videos costs more than they receive, eventually YouTube will end.

      I always imagined that YouTube was quite profitable?

  • xray@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I guess this will be an unpopular opinion, but YouTube is justified in doing this imo. Video hosting isn’t cheap, especially providing 4K & 8K. They’ve gotta be able to support costs somehow, and if you’re not paying for Premium, you should be paying with ads. You’re also preventing the content creators from being compensated for content that you find valuable, useful, and/or entertaining.

    I know ads are annoying, and I hate them just as much as you do. But a big reason why we have people who make super niche videos that help you learn how to fix something on your car or those regular videos that you watch every week is because the creators are able to get compensated for their work. Are you really saying that utility and entertainment isn’t worth 30 seconds of ads and it’s better to not support them at all?

    Part of the reason we’re in this enshittification era of social media is because of the expectation of social media to be free. We need to learn from our past mistakes. It’s not sustainable.

    • Sphere@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are plenty of viewers who don’t want/need/care about the resolution. Especially not 8K, probably not even 4K. People who watch on their phone, probably won’t even notice if the content doesn’t go above 720p.

      Anyway, if YT wishes to charge for their service, they should try having more reasonable fees, and making sure fees actually remove all ads from the service, and actually reward creators fairly - they get much less than they should as a proportion of fees paid.

      As it stands, it is much better to subscribe to the likes of Nebula or to individual creators through Patreon (if they host their videos there). The bill might end up adding up to something similar or even more than YouTube Premium, but at least you get what you paid for and the money goes to the creators, not to line Google’s executive’s pockets, which in the end means better content, better platforms and a better viewing experience.