I am mixing up a bit of ideas here. There is Satou the protagonist that has moral backbone with enough will power to not do anything. There is Hiro Ainana the author who chooses to write about how the Arisa is trying to rape him. And my human imperfect mind that has it’s own share of problems and struggles, and it twists my perception by hyperbole.
In mushoku the character was horrible, but the author was decent to write great adventure. In here the character is good and author is decent enough to keep him good, but my mind just is on the wrong frequency and it resonates with the things that I don’t want to resonate with.
(I was coding a game for a game jam for the whole week and the exhaustion has piled up in me that I neglected to keep my mind in check)
I am mixing up a bit of ideas here. There is Satou the protagonist that has moral backbone with enough will power to not do anything. There is Hiro Ainana the author who chooses to write about how the Arisa is trying to rape him. And my human imperfect mind that has it’s own share of problems and struggles, and it twists my perception by hyperbole.
In mushoku the character was horrible, but the author was decent to write great adventure. In here the character is good and author is decent enough to keep him good, but my mind just is on the wrong frequency and it resonates with the things that I don’t want to resonate with.
(I was coding a game for a game jam for the whole week and the exhaustion has piled up in me that I neglected to keep my mind in check)
I see. I was just wondering because one of the main draws of the series for many readers is that Satou is the polar opposite of Rudeus.