• MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    The solution is a second home tax, which is to be paid, if you do not live in a house for a given period every year. Obviously it needs to be high enough.

    • Spzi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      This would still allow the super rich to take over a town. So, another idea: A second home cap, which must not be exceeded. Say a village decides they can handle 1% of their houses owned by the 1%, but not more. Once these two houses found their part-time inhabitants, #3 must wait, or go somewhere else. A bit like garden plots, or boat piers. Naturally, this would also drive prices due to scarcity.

      • NeshuraA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d rather have a per-person cap. 1 Home + 1 Vacation Home are free. Every Home after gets taxed to oblivion.

        • Daze@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Fuck vacation homes. As long as not everybody has a home, nobody should have two.