Highlight:

“I have ordered a complete siege on the Gaza Strip. There will be no electricity, no food, no water, no fuel, everything is closed,” Gallant said. “We are fighting human animals and we are acting accordingly.”

  • Iceblade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is the intent to starve civilians or to deprive hamas combatants of any and all supplies?

    • NeshuraA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you are blocking an entire region from getting food and water then yes, the intent is to starve the civilian population.

      • Iceblade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Regardless of what we feel is intended or not, that is what war is - hell for everybody involved. Let’s just hope that this doesn’t get drawn out.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not what “intent to starve a civilian population” means. This is not a program of starvation. It’s cutting off resources before an invasion

        This isn’t your homebrew DnD game where you can make rules mean whatever you want.

        • NeshuraA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is not a program of starvation

          It is though. A program of cutting off resources would be blocking fuel and other goods, not fucking food and water. Ukraine was rightfully put in the corner for cutting off water to Crimea after 2014. There is no excuse to starving people, it’s a horrendous crime which should land the people involved in prison. Besides what do you think will happen now? Who will the Palestinians in Gaza trust more, the murder hobos who got them into this mess or the Israelis who decided collective punishment is an appropriate response? War crimes are called war crimes for a reason, just because one side commits them doesn’'t suddenly make it ok to commit them back.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            It isn’t, and whoever told you it is such is just lying to you.

            Idk where you people get your “news” but whatever podcasters you listen to are fucking braindead.

            You’re exactly equivalent to the dumbest of the MAGA by believing that tripe.

            • NeshuraA
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/10/9/israel-announces-total-blockade-on-gaza

              https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67051292

              Gaza is completely blockaded, by Israels own admission. If you don’t want to call it an attack on the entire population there, please go ahead and stay delusional. This is not OK, no matter who does it. It was not OK when Ukraine did it to Crimea, it’s not OK now. It’s heinous and despicable.

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It was not OK when Ukraine did it to Crimea

                Lmao of course the propaganda you fall for is pro-russian too.

            • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well the EU just called it a war crime. So between the text of the rule, the spirit of the rule, and the fucking international body of governments’ interpretation of the rule, I think I’m gonna stick with interpretation that intentionally cutting off food, water, and power to the entire region constitutes intentionally cutting off food and water to civilians.