Researchers have predicted the collapse of the AMOC could happen any time between 2025 and 2095 — far sooner than previous predictions, although not all scientists are convinced.

=====

What if…

    • Saneless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And they know how to fucking fix it but don’t want to

      It’d be like if in the movie Armageddon the government just said “Eh let’s see if it really will be that bad if it hits us”

            • arefx@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Without some sort of violent revolution, we won’t, or time runs out but it’s not a movie and there’s no ship to another planet.

                • Saneless@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Revolutions take over where reason stops. The people in power have the means to do the right thing, but sometimes they look out for a few people and will destroy thousands. That’s not a good option, as people get more desperate

      • Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        “We could do something about the asteroid, but think of the harm doing something could do to the shareholders!?”

        • Saneless@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was going to save humanity but I have a responsibility to a handful of shareholders that yell at me in meetings so… You can really see how hard this is for me

      • twitterfluechtling@lemmy.pathoris.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Only “they” is actually “us”. We voted those clowns into office. We knew (or should have known, the information was available) better at least since the 1970s.

        • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dude our election system is so fucked, I put that mostly on greedy corporations. But yeah, there’s no shortage of blame to go around.

        • Saneless@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, there’s a group of people who would rather make members who vote a certain way sad than save their own lives. I don’t get it

      • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s actually kind of too late now.

        But, we may be able to prevent more bad stuff happening if we change things today!

      • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        IDK, I mean we know it’s to do with carbon but we don’t really know how to stop producing that in a timely manner.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Carbon is causing global warming. We know how to fix global warming because we are causing it, we just have to stop doing it.

        This article is about global cooling which is bizarre and not something we expected would be happening. We haven’t got a clue why it’s doing that. It maybe natural, or it maybe it’s something we’ve done in a complicated way, but we don’t know so we don’t know how to fix it.

        If this is just an ice age why may as well burn all the coal now to try and stave it off.

        Although in reality I think this needs a lot more research before we do anything because this announcement makes no sense within our current understanding of the environmental science.

        • xohshoo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Umm, no. Go read it again.

          Global warming shuts off the current, so the warm air doesn’t shuttle north, causing local cooling, not global

    • ikiru@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have you tried being absurdly wealthy?

      I haven’t myself, but I hear it makes it all worth it.

    • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just long for a time when the conspiracy theorists are yelling about the end of the world and the scientists are running the country, not the other way around.

    • nexusband@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The doom depends on where you live. Florida? Yup, probably, but you where already living in hell. Europe? Iced up North Sea, really snowy north, big ice caps, Spain and portugal getting more cool…doesn’t sound that bad, to me personally.

      • Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        What? I moved to the nordics so that I’d be living in a tropical paradise soon, now there’s going to be more snow?

      • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Michigan’s Upper Peninsula is one of the places least likely to be affected by climate change, based on current models. In the US anyway.

        • nexusband@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mostly florida, as the “AMOC” transports the heat away from florida. Could very well be, that a stoppage of the AMOC would create a Hypercane and completely wreck everything in Florida. Cuba could also be absolutely done for. Canada would also probably have a LOT more snow - the Soutpole however would probably stop existing and what exactly is going to happen to Brazil is a complete unknown. Some simulations show the insta death of the rest of the rain forest. Some simulations actually show the opposite. However, Europe, Africa and Asia probably would see a lot lower temps - what exactly that would mean for the Climate in those areas is also highly speculative - however, it’s something that happened quite often throughout the history of earth. North America however has lots of other parts liveable, when Florida is “dead” and basically the Sahara.

          • NecessaryWeevil@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Happened quite often in the past…over the course of thousands of years. Man-made global warming is a very different animal.

            • nexusband@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, the collapse of the AMOC was pretty rapid in the past as well. And it’s separate from climate change. Man-made global warming is very complex and there are various things contributing to it.

          • Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You are the first person I’ve seen recognize the legitimate fear that these climate issues could result in hypercanes.

            Hurricanes of a size and fury as to not be measurable on current scale, Whose devastation could stretch across half a continent.

            • girthero@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Whose devastation could stretch across half a continent.

              Thats one way to stop carbon emissions!

  • virr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    TL;DR: New statistical model suggests that the AMOC (including gulf stream) could collapse to the much slower pattern by 2025 to 2095. This is a century earlier than previous predictions and the researchers were concerned. There is some questions on the accuracy of the model used, and that needs more research.

    Personally I don’t think we should wait for further testing to vet the model before acting. Try to do better now.

    • jerdle_lemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s kind of important whether it’s 2095 (prepare for it, set up nuclear, reduce carbon emissions) or 2025 (fuck global warming, we need fuel and we need it now, the more carbon emitted the better).

      • virr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Local cooling still global warming overall.

        The collapse of the current in the model is a direct result of global warming. The solution is to act like climate change is an emergency because it is.

        • jerdle_lemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s true if it’s closer to 2095. If it’s closer to 2025, there’s fuck all we can do to stop it, and so we need to do what’s best to survive it, which is not the same as what’s best to prevent it.

    • 30isthenew29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Scientists shouldn’t talk about the chances of not if something is sure enough. Politicians will latch onto that. Just make broad statements and go. Just like with the movie ‘Don’t look up’.

    • nexusband@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not really - the AMOC collaps between 2025 and 2095 was already in a 2005 paper. Nothing really “new”, IMHO.

  • rhsJack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We could try to vote people who will take action OR incentivize consumers to be more proactive BUT. Neither is ever going to happen.

    I was having dinner with my brother’s family and we were watching an interview with some celebrity that my sister-in-law adores. Dude is heavy in green activism and lists fast food places which are bad actors for climate and also farmers rights, etc. So my SiL announces we are never eating at such and such place again (I can’t remember, I never eat fast food anyway). The very next night they order takeout from said fast food place. They also always order same day deliver from Amazon despite it never actually arriving same day, but they get packages every damn day. Tons and tons of packaging for crap they always throw out or give away to neighbors eventually. This isn’t unique to them.

    This is MOST of America and I suspect the rest of the developed world. We are effed.

    • Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      cant elect people in america who would do anything, when we’re busy trying to fend off full blown fourth reichdom by electing the least awful candidate each election.

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I posted this twice now.

      But carbon taxes, externality corrections, cost of recycling plastic is in the cost of the product. Let the market fix it all. But no, people won’t even agree to raise taxes on fuel

  • spaysi@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Well that’s pretty scary… I mean, at least the scientists say that it’s more likely the current will just slow down rather than completely collapse? But then again, all the climate change models predicted a much more conservative timeline on when we would be experiencing the effects of climate change than what is actually happening in the real world now… so idk, scary shit man ☹️

    • slicedcheesegremlin@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      they also have admitted to only announcing the most optimistic results because nobody would believe them if they didn’t, and if people did it would be devastating

      • spaysi@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ugh, and of course because of that people have been dragging their feet on making necessary changes to the point of doing basically nothing anyway… I feel like the risk of people saying it’s too extreme maybe would have been worth instilling a sense of panic in people over climate change? Feels panic worthy to me

        • LUHG@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We have become so politically correct that giving people upsetting thought may actually kill us all.

      • 30isthenew29@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That was dumb of them. Enough people would believe to make make actual changes. To move earth and societies. Now what do we got? Too many people that don’t believe because they tried to make people believe. I think that all continues to be a massive mistake. Just know that most people aren’t that smart and you can convince a lot of them. Be not scary enough and those same not smart people will work against you with their emotion based reasoning.

      • spaysi@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, for real though considering they are saying it could happen anywhere from 2025 (wtaf) to 2095 (lol)

        • NeshuraA
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          given precedent of such estimates I’ll go with 01.04.2026 (April for people who still measure things in freedom eagles/burger)

    • Kandorr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      We should have listened, but your poster was washed from the main stream media!

  • Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As long as we finally get colder weather and snow in Germany again, I’m all for it. No, not really because it’s horrible but I try to see the positive things.

  • PrincessLeiasCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If anyone wants to read more about AMOC, here is a description from NASA along with the NASA illustration that was in the article:

    June 5, 2023

    BRIEF: As the ocean warms and land ice melts, ocean circulation — the movement of heat around the planet by currents — could be impacted. Research with NASA satellites and other data is currently underway to learn more.

    Edit: climate.nasa.gov is fantastic for this kind of stuff, btw. They have tons of data from their satellites you can download, visualizations, videos, charts, graphics, tutorials…just all sorts of things. It’s very cool.

  • Mangoholic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can remember a time when elon musk was still saying smart things… like if there’s even a 1% chance of it destroying the planet. We should do everything to avoid it.