• Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    5 days ago

    sure. that part is left ambigious, since “the best we can do” can refer to sabotage or “the highest quality bombs we could make”

    • jaycifer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m sorry, but did you read the post? Do you think that the highest quality explosive ordnance they could make would involve zero explosives being loaded in them, with zero of them exploding? The post leaves it completely unambiguous.

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        5 days ago

        Do you think that the highest quality explosive ordnance they could make would involve zero explosives being loaded in them, with zero of them exploding

        The highest quality bombs we could make… with no explosives