• ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’m so tempted to do a charity program on my own and just receive 50k of these and put Ubuntu 24.04 or another user friendly Linux and drive around with my car trunk open and with a sign that says “free computers” while driving through New York

  • Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    The article mentions how basic programs are missing. They acknowledge the existence of FOSS alternatives, e.g. GIMP instead of Photoshop Elements, but complain about it being too difficult or that some alternatives are simply not to be found via Mint’s “Software Manager”.

    Which is not news and probably one of the reasons why desktop Linux-based distros have still not become mainstream. There’s just a lack of all that “user-friendlyness” less tech-oriented people need.

    These things can be changed, although there is an economic barrier. FOSS projects are great and we see how many of them took off. However, if the main portion of users are not on Linux, but on Windoofs, then it doesn’t make much sense to invest time and money into developing and maintaining software for Linux while having commercial interests.
    The sad reality is that Microsoft has gained that market dominance. You won’t get end-user oriented software companies on board with Linux as long as the user-share is so comparably low. This is a self-reinforcing cycle.

    Windoofs meets UX needs and there is a lot of software people need -> most people use Windoofs -> companies develop and distribute for Windoofs -> people keep using Windoofs, etc…

    To break out of that, people need convincing alternatives. Not just for Linux alone, but especially for the software running on it.

    Which is hard to achieve, given how a plethora of Linux projects have to survive on donations alone and too few companies take the leap.

    There is a silver lining though. With the Steam Deck and Proton, Valve really got a lot more people on board with Linux. I can only hope, that this trend continues.

    But at the moment I fear that this will be short lived, especially with Microsofts “handheld Xbox” on the horizon.

    So let’s see, how this unfolds. The EOL of Windows 10 is really a strong incentive to switch to Linux. For my part, I will go for the full switch, since I’ve used Windoofs mainly for gaming anyway and am using Linux systems daily for my job. But then again, I am an engineering scientist and I can’t picture, e.g., my parents being satisfied with a Linux distro.

    • Silk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Getting radical, but software is another example of why capitalism sucks and how a socialist system could improve things.

      In the domain of software design and distribution, when these things are run by companies that need to compete for market share and profit, then it just creates so much waste with needing everything to. be subscription based and filled with ads etc.

      If we didn’t have this ultra competitive market system, then people who are passionate about software could be paid to self organise around various projects and design things for long term use value and not enshittification.

      • bitcrafter@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        Because people with the free time to do so have already come together and organized themselves around a single Linux distribution for this purpose?

    • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Lack of user-friendlylinesss ? What ? How much more user-friendly can we get ?

      Most things are point & click

      • grahamja@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Most isn’t good enough, it has to be better than Windows. People will pay money to deal with the devil they know rather than learning something new.

        • xye@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          47 minutes ago

          This is the reason I have my family on the Apple ecosystem as much as I hate it and wish I could throw open the doors of Linux and just live in that open source utopia. The number of devices needed and the purposes of those devices grows every year. Apple is mostly idiot proof, it’s the same experience across all devices, and I just do not have to worry as much about “can you help me with…”. I can’t imagine even attempting this with Linux. It would be a nearly full time IT job explaining things and putting out fires.

      • easily3667@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Most things until anything goes wrong, and then you’re out on your ass on the grub recovery screen

      • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Is this a joke? The main way most Linux users install software is still via the command line.

        On Windows the command line is an exceptional thing you sometimes have to use for troubleshooting. On Linux it’s the default way everything is done.

        For example how do you stop a service on Linux? The top answer just assumes command line.

        If I search for how to do it with a GUI I get a 5 year old post explaining that all the GUI attempts are dead.

        Now if I search for Windows, I get these instructions (from the AI but they sound like I remember it):

        open the Services console (search for “services” in the Start menu), right-click the service you want to stop, and select “Stop”.

        And the top SO question is someone asking specifically how to do it with the command line because the GUI way is so easy and obvious.

        That’s just one random example. Not even getting to hardware support, ease of installation, etc.

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          26 minutes ago

          Most things I do in command line I am not aware of or would want to do in a GUI on windows tbh. Recursive search for any files that contain a specific string? How do you do that on windows without.

          Most people just want Facebook and pornhub, Linux has everything you need.

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 minutes ago

          Is this a joke? The main way most Linux users install software is still via the command line.

          I reject the premise that the command line is not user friendly.

          With either a GUI or a command line, the first step is going to be “Search the internet for the instructions.”

          The second step for the command line option is “ctrl-c, ctrl-v”. The task is now complete.

          The GUI option is only superior if it allows the user to skip the “Search for it” step. If it does not, now you are manually searching some arcane hierarchy for the specific location the developer decided to place that option.

        • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Most things are point & click & no one uses CLI in windows, it’s objectively inferior to linux

          Also “start & stop a service” ? Does that sound like something an average user deals with in windows ?

          Linux does need a control panel, I can admit that but let’s not pretend that Linux’s CLI is tough to learn. & the CLI is the most effective way of doing things in a pinch, when push comes to shove.

          If someone like Pewdiepie (he’s no tech-savvy guy) can use linux, thrn linux has gotten user-friendly enough, although linux can do better & more needs to be done

          • Ease of installation😅 now you’re straight up lying, linux is by far easier to install with a liveUSB
          • as for hardware, that’s upto the manufacturers to open up their systems

          Thanks for revealing your hatred for linux (I cannot wait for you to call me a linux-cultist, eventhough I admitted that linux can do better)

          • easily3667@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            The bad cli thing is a 2000s view not a 2020s view. PowerShell is better than bash and windows terminal does everything I need both for local PowerShell stuff and remote bash stuff.

            • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Who cares about Pewdiepie, the point is how much more “user-friendly” do you want, the excuses never end. If a stupid guy like pootiepie can handle linuxmint, then people are out of excuses

              Plus it’s actually the apps that we’ll need to focus on (& games)

  • AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    How much ewaste has Microsoft caused just by wanting to sell more copies of the next version of windows.

    • b_van_b@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Windows 10 was released ten years ago. How long do you think they should provide support? For comparison, Redhat gives 10 years for LTS releases, and Ubuntu and Linux Mint give 5 years. Extended support beyond the LTS period requires a paid subscription, similar to Windows.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        25 minutes ago

        It’s more that the hardware requirements for 11 are pretty arbitrary and not based on how powerful it is. My old PC can’t run it, not that I care to in the first place. But it’s much more powerful than my work laptop that can and does run win11, though not by my choice.

      • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Every OS just mentioned can be updated, no support needed? Just overlay the next kernel over the last and all these distros provide a pathway for that.

        Moreover, Arch, Void, Gentoo etc are rolling, so no loss of support.

        I figure a multi-million dollar company could do the equivalent of exactly that.

        • easily3667@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Windows 10 can be updated for free to 11. This is only impacting the ewaste laptops that some vendors sell. Like the ones with 64 gb storage or 4-8 gb of ram or no tpm chip… All of which are roughly as shit as each other.

          • boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 minutes ago

            This also affects laptops with anything up to a 7th gen i7 and any amount of RAM and storage. Even if they have the correct TPM version. On a technical level, these devices are absolutely capable of running Windows 11, Microsoft just didn’t wanna.

        • lordbritishbusiness@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          The counter is that all of a sudden instead of windows 10 it was 10 from 2020, then 10 from 2022 and so on. Instead of only being the last version it became a succession of short lived versions that people still weren’t upgrading.

      • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        They don’t need to support Windows 10, they just need to not artificially block the installation of Windows 11 on old hardware.

      • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        1 day ago

        On a machine that can run it. If you have one of the machines that are the subject of this article, the only upgrade path is to buy a new one, for which Microsoft takes a healthy OEM fee for including Win11. You can easily see that cost on devices like the Legion Go S that cost significantly less for the SteamOS version.

        • easily3667@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          The technical requirements for 11 were reasonable when it came out and even more so today. Laptops being ewaste when they were built that way isn’t Microsoft’s fault.

  • The_Caretaker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Install Linux on them and give them to school children so they can go to school online and not have to worry about being shot. I also see a lot of lithium in that pile.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      seriously i just deleted windows and put mint on my laptop (which is only like from 2020ish) and it runs better than it ever did on windows

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, both my Linux PC’s probably wouldn’t even run Win 10, let alone Win 11. As long as they work, pretty much any PC from the last decade can still run any distro and be sufficient to do any kind of productivity workload.

      • Impleader@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Can confirm with Ubuntu 24.04 LTS vs my previous W11 install, it’s astonishing that a company with Microsoft’s resources can’t make an OS that runs as smoothly and efficiently as the open-source alternatives. Is it all just because of telemetry and whatever else Windows is phoning home with?

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I think it’s just that they don’t care about performance. It’s been the case for a while that typically games run faster on Linux through WINE/Proton despite using a translation layer.

          And there’s a bunch of background services taking up memory and CPU on Windows that are hard to turn off.

  • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The right answer is definitely not landfill.

    Most people use their computers to run a web browser, maybe a word processor or media player, and… not much else. Even someone who has only used Windows can figure out those basics on a Linux desktop.

    If the charities are unable/unwilling to provide support for Linux, they could give computers away on Craigslist before dumping more e-waste into our environment.

    • Droechai@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Biggest issue is teams Id guess. The nonprofit deals MS gives small nonprofits with free 365 licenses and management is a huge one around here

        • Droechai@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Some people has had issues with the moderation tools for meetings and connection to shared work files and note books via web, although the people having issues where on Chromebooks so might be different with Edge

    • 01011@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I’ve done this for years with people in my family - either Ubuntu or Linux Mint. All most of them use is the browser, word processor, spreadsheets and an image and media viewer.

      For Desktop Environment I stick to KDE or something that looks and acts similar to Windows XP.

      I get very few complaints.

    • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 days ago

      My wife’s 90 year old grandma was able to pick up Mint with absolutely no issue. Just put the shit she needed on the desktop and that was that.

      • MooseyMoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 days ago

        I did that for my grandmother with FreeBSD many moons ago, on a Pentium3 no less. It ran for years and years like a champ. Booted straight into PySol since that was pretty much all she ever did on a computer.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Even someone who has only used Windows can figure out those basics on a Linux desktop.

      You’d think…

      • ChilledPeppers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Lol, I switched to kde plasma and because the windows logo bottom left was replaced with a K, neither my dad or my sister knew how to shut down the pc 🤦‍♀️

  • venotic@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Linux. Each Linux OS, breathes new life into an old laptop. Least if that laptop is at least 15 ~ 20 years old. Laptops from the late 90s though? May have to go very old school Linux.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It breaks my heart that so much of these will end up in landfills. Resell them. Or send them to device recycling. There’s a shitload of rare earths in modern-ish but obsolete computers. And downcycling is possible too - my router is an old Lenovo thin client with a dual port 10g SFP+ card slapped in it.

  • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    … that’s a really compelling reason for linux.

    I mean the next few years are going to be rough. Being able to recycle these things for basic use is going to be huge. Windows, mac, people need the internet more than anything else. It’s a sad way to gain adoption but it could be insanely impactful…

  • sudoku@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Looking at the used market where I live, quite a large number of laptops are already sold with Windows 11 installed even when officially unsuported. Activated with MAS as well, probably.

  • PokerChips@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I think there are a lot of gunky software out there that only works on Windows. I tried getting my mom on Linux but I was unable to find any good open source sewing and graphic alternatives to the expensive lock in hardware that she had already bought.

    Although I doubt these are the kind of road blocks charities are facing.

    • Zloubida@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Companion softwares” for hardware are the only thing that still makes me use my Windows VM. In my case it’s my children’s educative computers which need a real computer to add content.

  • Back in the day, there was a distributed cluster OS called Mosix. Even back then I had several spare computers lying about, and the idea of being able to chain them all together and have one virtual computer that would automatically distribute processing without special coding was enticing. It turned out to not work very well unless you did specially code for it, or clustered the computers very tightly with fiber; it just wasn’t worth it.

    But when I see piles of compute like this, a part of my still wants to network them all together and run … well, whatever fills the shoes of OpenMosix these days, if anything does.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, I’ve always wanted to do something like that. I’ve always got a bunch of computers running virtually idle and it would be nice if they could just help out with whatever your main PC is doing.

    • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Some modern workloads can take advantage of multiple computers. You can usually compile using things like distcc and spread the load across them.

      If you make them into a Kubernetes cluster you can run many copies or many different things.

      It’s still an unsolved problem: we still end up with single core bottlenecks to this day, before even involving other machines altogether.

      • Yes. It’s always the bandwidth that’s the main bottleneck, whether CPU-Memory, IPC, or the network.

        Screw quantum computers; what we need is quantum entangled memory sharing at a distance. Imagine! Even if only within a single computer, all memory could could be L1 cache.

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    One-click Linux cluster. Local compute, NAS, or self-hosting. Be a shame if it all ended in landfill.