• DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Google’s sideloading restrictions seems almost like its perfectly timed… 👀

    Anyways, Google can gargle my:

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    When I had an iPhone 3GS I got in a hot tub with it in my pocket and it died. I let it dry out. Then I very carefully took it apart and found all the little white stickers inside that turn from white to pink when in contact with water. I used a razor blade to remove those stickers without damaging them. I then placed a drop of bleach on each which turned them back to white and let them dry out. I used very tiny amounts of super glue to re-apply them to the exact same positions within the phone and then very carefully reassembled the phone.

    Took the phone into an Apple store. Guy disappeared into the back for about 10 minutes with it. Came back out and said it must have just up and died but he doesn’t know how and gave me a new iPhone.

    Only Apple product I’ve ever owned.

    Fuck you Apple.

  • Luffy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Does anyone remember how the Devs from there didnt want to release for Android because ApPlE iS sOoOo mUcH mOoOrE sEcUrE

    Get rekt.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Needs to be a website, would be best on i2p, but i fear no one would be able to figure out how to get to it.

          • ubergeek@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            You can use a I2P proxy for access via the clearnet. Additionally, many people can set up I2P proxies that can only being used to access that site. Take one down, there’s a bajillion others to choose.

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 days ago

              I2P proxy

              With the current political weather, you’re going to want the client anonymity protection. All they need to do is run a handfull of proxies, and they’ll narrow down your house/phone as ICE targets.

              We’re beyond the nahh nahh can’t get me because i’m not sharing illegal files, you’ll get trucked off like the immigrants.

              If they can log you reporting ICE to a website, you’re toast.

              • ubergeek@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                That’s fair. We need a solution to that.

                Riseup and similar VPN services need to get spun up more. Or push people to solutions like briar

            • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              It’s not accessible enough to someone working 60-70hr weeks trying to make enough to survive as an illegal migrant in the US. Maybe if people were actually out there protecting their neighbours and being the ones checking these sorts of apps. But they’re all living paycheck to paycheck too and just aren’t. Trump’s current policies are literal decades in the making.

              • ubergeek@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                I think you mistook what Im saying. Im saying, as a project, those who can, should set up these in proxies to aid those who cant and need it.

                • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  I understood that, I’m talking about even setting up the proxies on a device so you can access services. It’s my understanding that I2P is similar enough to Tor. A user setting themselves up to access a Tor service is still difficult for the average user, especially if they are time poor.

    • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      55
      ·
      7 days ago

      In terms of security alone, iPhones easily beat most Android phones. Which may be a fair argument in favor of iPhones. However, to ignore Apple’s policies and long history of delisting similar apps is delusional.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        In regards to security, Apple does have three upsides, and only those:

        • No sideloading and no unlocked bootloader means you can’t sideload malware or install malware-preloaded ROMs. No root also means you can’t just install malware that uses root access.
        • Long OS support means fewer people run around with iPhones that are 5 OS versions behind.
        • There’s no tiny boutique iPhone manufacturers who sell phones that come pre-loaded with malware.

        The solution for the first one is “don’t sideload untrusted stuff” and the solution to the second and third one is “buy an Android phone from a trusted manufacturer that has long term OS support”.

        • Taldan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          No sideloading and no unlocked bootloader means you can’t sideload malware or install malware-preloaded ROMs

          It’s a simple configuration change to disable it and can be done with any corporate MDM system, making this a moot point. Not to mention too many people don’t understand security, so Android is taking away sideloading anyway, FoR sEcUriTY

          No root also means you can’t just install malware that uses root access

          The vast majority of Android phones do not come with root access. For both, you generally have to elevate access yourself

          Long OS support means fewer people run around with iPhones that are 5 OS versions behind

          If you’re running an out-of-date OS, clearly security is not a priority

          There’s no tiny boutique iPhone manufacturers who sell phones that come pre-loaded with malware

          Supply chain attacks absolutely can happen to iPhones as well. There are plenty of re-sellers


          You missed the actual security benefit over iOS that Android cannot compete with: Apple controls the entire software chain from security patch to OTA update. This allows them to patch and release a fix for critical vulnerabilities far faster than any Android device possibly could. Apple does not need to get the approval of an OEM (such as Samsung), and, due to special deals, they do not need to get the approval of a carrier (like Verizon). Android devices typically need to get approvals from both before releasing updates (although Google flagship phones can bypass one, and can fast track the other)

          The downside there is there are no checks on Apple. They could release a horribly vulnerable patch with no additional checks in-between

          • squaresinger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            You don’t seem to get my point and seem to think that I’m some apple fanboy that you need to convince or win against.

            I use android, I’ve never used iOS. I enjoy the freedom of sideloading. Still it is a fact that the overwhelming majority of malware infections on Android happen due to side loading. The percentage of devices running corporate MDM is tiny, making this a moot point.

            The vast majority of Android phones do not come with root access. For both, you generally have to elevate access yourself

            And yet quite a few devices in the wild run rooted or custom ROMs.

            If you’re running an out-of-date OS, clearly security is not a priority

            You seem to forget what this thread is about. It’s not about personal security and whether one can run a safe android device, but about an app developer not providing an Android version, because the platform as a whole (meaning the average user) is less secure.

            Personal preferences like paying for a new, non-outdated phone don’t really matter for that big picture view.

            Supply chain attacks absolutely can happen to iPhones as well. There are plenty of re-sellers

            That’s a strange argument. Getting malware that survives a factory reset onto an iPhone without apple’s approval is close to impossible. Making an Android phone from scratch that contains malware right in the system image has been done over and over again. You are argueing a hypothetical versus something that happens every day.

        • liuther9@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          7 days ago

          Long os support meant to intentionally brick your iphone so you buy new. That is 100% true as I had many apple products started degrading after upgrade and still have old models that are not upgraded and work perfectly

          • squaresinger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            I’m not defending apple here. Short OS support (or none at all) is not a good thing, and it’s something that’s sadly still quite common if you buy the wrong Android brand.

            Samsung is doing pretty well in that regard right now.

            • liuther9@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              In other words do not confuse long support with good support as these are totally different things

            • liuther9@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              Sorry, didn’t think I had to clarify it. Long support is good IF has good intentions behind it. Most long supported os has bad intentions behind it as making old models inferior and unusable as in case with ios on iphone 5. For example in my opinion windows xp was THE best windows, maybe on par with seven. So if you give me two options, first is updating my phone so it becomes laggy and unusable or keep current version, I will choose to stay on old OS.

              • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                Most long supported os has bad intentions behind it as making old models inferior and unusable as in case with ios on iphone 5.

                Your evidence is an iPhone that came out 13 years ago last month? Back in those days, the year over year improvements in the hardware were immense, and the software tried to take advantage of it. But people would complain, A Lot, if those features didn’t come to their older device. Do you remember how much folks lost their mind when the iPhone 4 came out and iOS 4 allowed it and the 3GS to have a home screen wallpaper, but not the iPhone 3G? People were pissed and called it “planned obsolescence” that it didn’t get the feature. So, when the iPhone 4 hit iOS 7, they included all the animations. And then people called it planned obsolescence that it stuttered.

              • squaresinger@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                It really depends on what your goal is. Usability, keeping a familiar interface, performance, all of that are things that make it reasonable to stay on an outdated OS, and none of these reasons are bad.

                Security (which is the only thing we are really talking about here) does require updates.

                If security is your most important concern, you need to update. If security is not your biggest concern and other topics are more important for you, it might be reasonable to stay on older versions.

                But in the context of this post, which was purely about security, having long term security updates is important.

        • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          7 days ago

          Based on most smartphones being very insecure. Of course, iPhones aren’t extremely secure, but the competition is practically nonexistent. Pretty much the only secure Android phones are Pixels. Samsung is considered one of the more secure manufacturers too, but according to GrapheneOS devs it’s still way behind Google.

          Note that even police and government agencies sometimes have trouble getting into iPhones. They never have such troubles getting into Android smartphones, except Pixels.

          This is by no means meant to advertise iPhones. It’s just a simple observation that security in smartphones is heavily lacking.

          • Taldan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            Both iPhones and Android phones can be configured to your desired security level. Both are used by various government agencies around the world for their most important secrets. Neither are secure out of the box. You have to harden them to your desired level of security

            Arguing whether Android or iOS is more secure is a bit like arguing whether an SUV or pickup is safer. It doesn’t matter which you pick when basic security steps are magnitudes more important: Wearing a safety belt, having a functioning air bag, driving a safe speed, not driving drunk, etc.

          • Potatar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            Dude give one example so we can google and have our own opinion. You are just saying “because they said so/because someone considered it so”.

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        In terms of security alone, iPhones easily beat most Android phones

        That’s not how security works in the modern tech landscape. No major OS is going to meet a high security standard out of the box. All of them have to be configured to the desired security level, then be added to ongoing security efforts. Every major OS can be secured to the highest security standards

        The primary difference is how much effort each takes, but even then there isn’t much of a difference. You’ll find tooling and in-house expertise makes a much larger difference than the OS

        The myth that some OS are inherently secure really needs to die off

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Every major OS can be secured to the highest security standards

          Has Android added E2EE to their cloud backups yet like Apple has?

          Apple is no friend to any of us, but Google openly and shamelessly scrapes every piece of data you put on their phones. Apple is absolutely the lesser of these two evils with out of the box functionality. I say this as a lifelong Android fan and Apple hater that entered the cybersecurity space and am only interested in the most private option I can get out of the box.

          Like an Android can be more secure and private than an IPhone, but afaik that involves owning a Pixel specifically and installing an entirely different OS on it, one that Google a Is also out to get.

          • Xatolos@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            You do know that Apple privately scrapes every piece of data you put on their phones right? Go read the privacy and ad policies. Apple also gives access to a lot of their users private information (China has full access to its users iCloud), will remove apps like this (while Google still allows apps that block ad trackers like DuckDuckGo that block Google own trackers). And Google supports CSE.

            We get it from your post, your a huge and blind Apple fan that wants to do anything you can to confuse others into believing falsely like you that Apple is somehow a great company and product. But the truth is, Apple doesn’t care about your privacy, lies to your face about it, and makes you less secure and your information less private as these situations show. And if you were in cybersecurity, you’d know this.

            • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              I’m not much of an Apple fan, I just like to get my privacy where I can. And with over a decade of experience in cybersecurity I can confidently say that as much as you shouldn’t blindly trust Apple, they at least give you a number of tools to increase your privacy out of the box.

              Android on the other hand is a nightmarish hellscape of data mining and user profiling. There is GrapheneOS which is as of today a great option to circumvent Google’s data mining, but now that its future is at stake I worry for the future of privacy on Android devices.

              But we get it from your post, you’re a pro-Google shill bot that didn’t actually read my comment and is just regurgitating nonsense to muddy the waters.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Disclaimer: The app is closed source, so all we can go off is the developer’s word, although the fact the government removed it is a strong indicator they don’t have access to data from the app

      The developer stated they do not even retain any identifying data, so the only data the government could get is public anyway. Through Apple they’d be able to see who downloaded it, and likely when it was used. Your defense would be easy enough though: “I just wanted to make sure the libs weren’t harassing our fascist patriotic ICE agents near me”

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        It is impossible to send a (edit: true) push notification to a device without knowing which device it is going to. The developer may not know/have access to that information, but Apple/Google know which devices they are sending those pushes to. If it wasn’t a true push notification, then they would not arrive in a timely manner and potentially only when the app was opened the next time.

        He was using true push notifications, so the government could just subpoena that information.

        He could maybe obfuscate who initiated the initial message, but its impossible to do that for the receivers.

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    “Good thing I got revenge though on Google’s sideloading ban by buying a phone that never allowed it to begin with”

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      We should make webapps for everything. When done properly they are as fast as native apps, can work on any device and do not require a dev license or account.

    • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      there are technically alternative marketplaces on iOS in the EU, but they do the exact thing google is now copying off apple: apple still has to give the green light. apple “notarizes” every app, even if it goes through a third party app store. this changes the app irreversibly, and ios/ipados devices can only install notarized apps.

  • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    This is why the web is way better than any app store, yes even with the problems of DNS (DIDs becoming more prevalent cant come fast enough though). Any future phones should have a first class web experience imo.

    Edit: I wanna add that browser monopolies are a real threat too. Ladybird is legit on Charlie Kirk’s side aka nonpolitical so not a fan of the outlook there. Would love to see KDE fork chromium/blink with valve money and recreate Konquerer and bring back KHTML (I like irony). Valve even has a fork of CEF (Chromium Embedded Framework, electron uses this as well) because of Steam and its ui being a big web app. KDE then has web apps and add them to Discovery, or you can build qt apps. Make it happen valve! And hire me to help lol

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s how I browse Lemmy - I sometimes forget that my home-pinned app, Voyager, isn’t actually from the app store.

  • Salvo@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m gonna play devils advocate here (and probably be monstrously downvoted);

    ICEBlock stored the location data of all its users on Apples iCloud Servers. This the perfect target for ICE; a complete database of locations of every person who doesn’t want ICE to know where they are.

    One assumption is that that Apple realised how tempting this data is to the current demonstrative administration and purged it before ICE could get their civil-liberty-abusing mitts on it.

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        Alternate take: Tim is a businessman doing what’s best for Apple and he personally might not support Trump, but we will likely never know.

        • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          7 days ago

          Tim Apple is a billionaire, doing billionaire things. Supporting the people who give him the most power and not giving a fuck about anyone else.

        • ErmahgherdDavid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Same take my friend. I agree - Tim’s personal politics are kinda irrelevant in this context. Best for apple=compliance with whoever is in charge so they get to keep their money printer. Corpos gonna corpo

        • fodor@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          Oh, so you’re trying to say that Tim is so greedy that he doesn’t have values at all, other than his greed? That’s an interesting position, but I think it makes him sound even worse than the previous one.

          • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            7 days ago

            It’s an inherent byproduct of capitalism.

            If you rise to Tim Cook’s level you must be someone that is either willing to put your personal values aside or you do not have them to begin with. The growth of the company matters more and if you prioritize your values you will be filtered the moment you misalign with whatever prevents maximal growth.

            Capitalism does not care about values, ethics, morals, social wellness, or anything besides growth. It is cancerous and leads to a toxic society that poisons itself and falls apart, which is literally happening

          • REDACTED@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            You don’t succesfully run big corporations by having high moral standarts, this was never an argument. Argument was about what makes businessman a good business man, and one major thing is seizing opportunities and “playing” important people like Trump. I don’t think he’s anywhere as (morally) bad as Steve Jobs was, but he’s doing his job as expected.

          • Pieplup@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            If he does he doesn’t have morals to care about acting on his values as such they are more or less irrelevant.

      • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        You’re absolutely right. Economic motivations decide the trajectory a company may take. Ethics, green washing, queer rights and other factors take a back seat. If they come with financial benefits, the company will follow that path, but that’s always because of money—no matter what the marketing material actually says.

        Remember when companies were supporting sexual and gender minorities? That was because financial incentives aligned with that at the time. Remember when those turncoats suddenly scrapped the DEI programs and removed all rainbow themes? Same motivation again. Facade changed, but the foundation is still the same.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Something worth noting, if you are using iCloud, advanced data protection is your friend. Apple doesn’t have the encryption keys, you do.

      This is not on by default.

      • Salvo@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Advanced Data Protection does require all iCloud Ecosystem devices to be current.

        Not every person can afford the latest and greatest.

        • Jesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          It requires iOS 16 and MacOS 13.

          The devices that max out at those operating systems are 9 and 10 year old.

        • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Current or on a current OS?

          Edit: I just enabled it and I have a iPhone 11 on my iCloud account.

          So, just latest OS.

          Which Apple gives you basically forever instead of maybe a year of old updates with android.

    • brem@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      Money is always the answer with these “people”.

      To assume otherwise is to feed the beast

  • HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    This kind of thing is coming for Android as well once Google has converted it to it’s own walled garden bullshit.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Who could have seen this coming from the company whose CEO gifted Trump a literal gold plaque in celebration of his reelection?

      • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I keep seeing things about how x, y or z company “caved” to government pressure, as if companies have ever made value judgements in the modern era. What this decision would have come down to, the only thing it could legally come down to, is shareholder value. Considering Apple secured a reprieve on tariffs, it’s absolutely within reason that Trump and/or his administration threatened them with cancelling said reprieve. At that point, the decision would be based off the loss of sales for taking it down, against the loss of sales of devices due to tariff price increases.

        Apple has a fiduciary duty to their shareholders first and foremost. There is nothing stopping this batshit insane administration from enacting tariffs, and then using the SEC and DOJ to investigate and bring charges that they aren’t upholding their responsibilities to their investors.

          • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Ahahahahahahahahahahahaaa, oh wait, you’re serious? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

            Edit: I know I’m being a fair bit of a jerk in the rest of my comment, but this is pawssibly the most ridiculous assertion that I’ve seen on Lemmy, and I have no idea how to pawperly refute it.

    • bigfondue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 days ago

      They probably just hinted. These companies are eager to please Trump. Remember the trophy Tim Apple gave Trump? Capitalists love fascism.

    • DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      No, they don’t have to. The corporations are the ones who want to control everyone. The U.S government is just a tool for them. The politicians are basically just actors at this point.

      • Pieplup@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s a bit more complicated than that and trump also isn’t as easy to control cause he is a member of the billionare class. It’s why there was that movement to try and replace trump with DeSantis. There’s also multiple factions. of billionaires as well. Some of them are idealogical fascists. Some only care about money. Some are technofeudalists. Corporations or more accuratlely Capitalists control the government yes. But the billionare class isn’t a monolith. There’s also a cost benefit analysis. Morals aside there is little benefit for apple to oppose trump unless they think opposing trump will significantly impact their sales. Which reasonably don’t think will be the case. especially if the competitor is also playing ball.

    • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      They also caved into PRC government and they removed the apps that reported on HK police activity and added restrictions for airdrop to make information sharing harder.

  • Aljernon@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Fuck Apple but honestly this app is like trying to stay warm with matches in Antarctica.