Fans customized the Wicked movie poster to more closely match the original Broadway poster.

Original Broadway Poster:

Movie poster:

Some fans, disappointed by the poster, altered it to be closer to the original, moving Grande’s hand and lowering the brim of Erivo’s hat to cover her eyes. The edits prompted Erivo to respond. “This is the wildest, most offensive thing I have seen

“None of this is funny. None of it is cute. It degrades me. It degrades us,” Erivo continued. “The original poster is an ILLUSTRATION. I am a real life human being, who chose to look right down the barrel of the camera to you, the viewer… because, without words we communicate with our eyes.”

So, this seems like a completely reasonable reaction to fans making fan content.

  • theblueredditrefugee@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Without words we communicate with our eyes

    True, but this actress ain’t doing that. She’s completely dissociated in the pic, her expression so blank and emotionless, screaming that she’s dead inside. While a dissociated character could make a good villain, it’s not hard to see that the character in the poster for the musical isn’t a dissociated villian who is unaware of her cruelty but someone who is fully conscious of and revels in it. It’s only natural that people who are fans of the original work notice just how out of character this is and try to fix it.

    Don’t like it? Stop making stupid remakes of ancient stuff and make something original for once! Maybe try putting some emotion into it!

    But you know, that’d require Hollywood actually put in effort and they’ve probably forgotten how to do that by now. Seriously, is anyone watching the new shit that they fart out over there these days? Most everyone I know either rewatches old shit or watches anime. Hey, maybe we’ll see the rise of Bollywood over the next couple decades, who knows?

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 hours ago

    What an utterly ridiculous and inconsequential thing to get upset about. Someone should tell her to re-read what she just wrote and think about how stupid it sounds.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I was on the fence about giving any time to viewing Wicked but I think it’s gonna be a hard pass now.

    • TBi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Same. Was going to see it in the cinema opening week. Now I’ll wait for the reviews and streaming release. I’ve already seen the broadway show (excellent show btw).

  • Kayday@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I prefer the original poster. The new poster still looks like Wicked to me, and I would be disappointed if it recreated the original exactly. The fan edit is fun, I like it, but I understand artists from current year who made the modern poster would want to make a statement different than artists from when the original came out.

    Everyone is making art, why do we have to be mad about that?

  • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    because, without words we communicate with our eyes

    IDK, the original and the edit both communicate way more mystique and mischievousness than the one with her eyes visible

  • GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    In matters of taste, the customer is always right.

    Nobody but the audience gets to decide what the audience wants. Not writers, not actors, not directors, not graphic designers. If you can give the audience something they didn’t know that they wanted until they got it, so much the better for you. But if the audience just plain wants something else, then there’s no amount of cajoling or negotiation that will make them feel otherwise.

    That said, I have no idea what the collective response is to either of these posters, and this does feel a bit like a tempest in a teapot.

    • squid_slime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      You haven’t worked a service gig comrade. When someone asks for they’re bacon sandwich to be raw you’ll understand.

  • 5in1k@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    23 hours ago

    If that’s the most offensive thing they have seen they live a charmed life.

    • TastyWheat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I could easily make it worse by simply copying and posting a cup onto the poster.

      Yes, the Internet has broken me…

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yeah maybe not calling out your fans on making things that build excitement for your upcoming project is the best course of action as an actor. It’s like Daisy Ridley calling out Star Wars fans for having the wrong body shape in cosplay or something else equally stupid. They’re fans. They’re having fun. You don’t get to tell your fans how they’re supposed to enjoy your work.

  • stewie3128@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    The ego and vanity is astounding. And the movie poster sucks because she’s looking straight at the camera.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That’s quite the oversimplification of a real life human being, who chose to look right down the barrel of the camera to you, the viewer… because, without words we communicate with our eyes.

    • sheogorath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago

      And I’m 90% sure that originally they wanted to make it matches the original styling but she fought to keep her face fully visible. So that’s why she’s so irked that there’s a fan who made that edit and proved the people who suggested that in the first place right.

  • kshade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is the wildest, most offensive thing I have seen

    Congratulations I guess?

  • rothaine@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    In the original Broadway poster and the fan edit, it looks like they’re up to something–there’s some mischievousness at play, some wickedness.

    I don’t really know what the full-face one is supposed to convey.